State DOE requests U.S. Army Corps study combined impacts of coal terminal proposals

Published on Tue, May 8, 2012 by Jeremy Schwartz

Read More The Lighthouse Blog

The Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) is urging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to study the combined effects of several coal terminals proposed for the Washington and Oregon coasts.

DOE director Ted Sturdevant wrote in a May 7 letter to Army Corps officials that DOE is concerned about the cumulative impacts of a number of coal export terminals proposed for the waters of off Washington and Oregon. Sturdevant included this letter with comments DOE officials had made on a terminal proposal slated to transfer coal from a yet-to-be constructed port near Boardman, Oregon, to another terminal on the mouth of the Columbia River.

“DOE] is especially concerned about cumulative impacts because the present proposal is one of several proposed projects aimed at expanding coal export capacity within a defined geographic region (i.e., the states of Washington and Oregon),” Sturdevant wrote in the letter.

The Army Corps requires permits from individuals and companies wishing to do construction in the waters of the United States. The at-least-six coal terminals proposed for the Washington and Oregon coasts, including the Gateway Pacific Terminal proposed for the Cherry Point area just south of Birch Bay, fall under this description.

Specifically, DOE staff were providing comment on permit applications recently submitted to the Army Corps by Coyote Island Terminals, a subsidiary of Ambre Energy North America. This project, based near Boardman, Oregon, would transfer coal by barge west to another proposed terminal closer to the mouth of the Columbia River and handle up to 8.8 million tons of coal annually, with 11 trains, 12 loaded barges and two large transport ships calling per week.

DOE officials made the case that several federal court cases support the completion of an environmental impact statement (EIS) detailing the cumulative impacts of the myriad coal terminal proposals coming down the pipe. The Army Corps would complete this study separate from an EIS for any individual terminal project.

In the comments to the Army Corps, DOE officials called out the combined rail traffic impacts of the proposed coal terminals as a main concern. The combined rail traffic induced by the Gateway Pacific Terminal, the Boardman project and the Millennium Bulk terminal proposed for Longview, Washington, would put significant strain on existing rail infrastructure, DOE officials alleged. Trains carrying coal from Wyoming would all take the same rail route across Washington to their final destination.

“[These] proposals at full build-out could result in approximately 18 daily trips (Gateway Pacific Terminal) and 16 daily trips (Millennium Bulk terminal),” DOE officials wrote. “Thus, a minimum of 37 coal trains might daily transit the same route.”

The comments also call out the ways increased rail traffic could negatively impact human health, such as through increased diesel train engine emissions and coal dust escaping uncovered coal cars. DOE officials also noted the significant public concern about the proposed coal export terminals and their combined human health impacts.

“The potential for these and other types of impacts has not gone unnoticed by communities located along this [rail] corridor,” DOE officials wrote. “Many are expressing strong concerns about the potential for significant environmental impacts that could occur from the cumulative impacts of these proposals.”

The Army Corps is by no means required to conduct the cumulative study the DOE is requesting. However, DOE officials urged such impacts should nevertheless be considered in permitting decisions for the individual terminal permit applications.

“Should the [Army Corps] decline to do this broader cumulative impact analysis as part of a single EIS, it is still imperative that agencies making permit decisions on individual projects consider the direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of those decisions,” DOE officials wrote.

Click here for a look at DOE director Sturdevant’s letter and here for a look at DOE’s more detailed comments.

 


 
Inside the Lighthouse


Welcome to the Lighthouse, the official blog of The Northern Light newspaper. The Lighthouse is the place for some breaking news, previews of upcoming articles, smaller news items and some tidbits of local information that might not make it into the print edition of The Northern Light.

The Northern Light reporter Brandy Kiger will be the main contributor to The Lighthouse, but other staff from The Northern Light may add items from time to time.

The Lighthouse is a work in progress and may undergo substantial changes as readers react to the content posted here. The Northern Light kindly asks for the patience of its readers as we edge ever so slightly into the world of blogging.

Thank you, and enjoy The Lighthouse Blog!